If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() Weed ResearchVolume 44 Issue 2, Pages 71 - 77 Published Online: 12 Mar 2004 © 2010 European Weed Research Society The Official Journal of the European Weed Research Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 1307K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Physiological and molecular basis for ALS inhibitor resistance in Bromus tectorum biotypes Copyright 2004 European Weed Research Society KEYWORDS
Bromus tectorum
• ALS inhibitor • acetolactate synthase • herbicide resistance • cross-resistance •
als gene • point mutation Summary
Primisulfuron-resistant (AR and MR) and -susceptible (AS and MS) Bromus tectorum biotypes were collected from a Poa pratensis field at Athena, Oregon, and in research plots at Madras, Oregon. Studies were conducted to characterize the resistance of the B. tectorum biotypes. Whole plant bioassay and acetolactate synthase (ALS) enzyme assay revealed that the AR biotype was highly resistant to the sulfonylurea (SU) herbicides, primisulfuron and sulfosulfuron and to a sulfonylaminocarbonyltriazolinone (SCT) herbicide, propoxycarbazone-sodium. However, the AR biotype was not resistant to imazamox, an imidazolinone (IMI) herbicide. Results of the whole plant bioassay studies showed that the MR biotype was moderately resistant to all ALS inhibitors tested. However, there were no differences in ALS sensitivities between the MR and MS biotypes. The nucleotide and amino acid sequence analysis of the als gene demonstrated a single-point mutation from C to T, conferring the exchange of the amino acid proline to serine at position 197 in the AR biotype. However, this mutation was not found in the MR biotype. Results of this research indicate that: the resistance of the AR biotype to SU and SCT herbicides is based on an altered target site due to a single-point mutation; resistance in the MR biotype is not due to a target site mutation. Received 30 July 2003 Revised version accepted 29 October 2003 |