ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 506K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Differences in the determinants of eplerenone, spironolactone and aldosterone binding to the mineralocorticoid receptor*
Fraser M Rogerson, Yizhou Yao, Brian J Smith and Peter J Fuller
  Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research, Clayton and   Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
Correspondence to  Professor Peter Fuller, Prince Henry's Institute of Medical Research, PO Box 5152, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia. Email: peter.fuller@phimr.monash.edu.au

  *Presented at the 25th Annual Scientific Meeting of the High Blood Pressure Research Council of Australia.

Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd
KEYWORDS
aldosterone antagonists • aldosterone • corticosteroid receptors • mineralocorticoid receptor

Summary

AbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementReferences

1. The importance of mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists in the treatment of cardiovascular disease has been emphasised by two recent clinical trials, one using spironolactone and the other using a new selective MR antagonist, namely eplerenone.

2. Eplerenone has a very low affinity for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Determinants of binding specificity of eplerenone to the MR were investigated using chimeras created between the ligand-binding domains (LBD) of the MR and the GR. These chimeras had been used previously to investigate aldosterone and spironolactone binding specificity to the MR.

3. Eplerenone competed strongly for [3H]-dexamethasone binding to a MR/GR chimera containing amino acids 804–874 of the MR and weakly to a chimera containing amino acids 672–803 of the MR. Within the 804–874 region, eplerenone competed for [3H]-dexamethasone binding to a chimera containing amino acids 820–844 of the MR, although the calculated affinity was approximately 10-fold lower than for binding to the full-length MR LBD. Similar results were obtained using another MR antagonist, namely spironolactone. Modelling of eplerenone binding to the MR LBD, based on the GR LBD crystal structure, suggests that amino acids 820–844 affect the overall shape of the ligand-binding pocket and that eplerenone acts as an MR antagonist because it fails to stabilize the active conformation of the receptor.

4. In contrast with results with the MR antagonists eplerenone and spironolactone, amino acids 820–844 are sufficient in themselves to confer high-affinity aldosterone binding to the MR, suggesting that the binding determinants of the two antagonists are similar to each other but differ from those of aldosterone.


Received 10 May 2004; revision 22 July 2004; accepted 6 August 2004.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.04079.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Asia Scientists Click Here