ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

Volume 57 Issue 6, Pages 695 - 713

Published Online: 21 Apr 2004

Journal compilation © 2010 The British Pharmacological Society



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 165K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The revision of the Declaration of Helsinki: past, present and future
Robert V. Carlson , Kenneth M. Boyd 1 & David J. Webb
 Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, and
  1 Medical Teaching Organization, University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, UK
Correspondence to  Dr Robert Carlson, Clinical Senior Lecturer in Medical Ethics, Clinical Research Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK.
Tel: + 0131 537 1737
Fax: + 0131 343 6017
E-mail: r.carlson@ed.ac.uk
Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
KEYWORDS
justice • Nuremberg Code • placebo-controlled trial • publication bias • research ethics • World Medical Association

ABSTRACT

The World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki was first adopted in 1964. In its 40-year lifetime the Declaration has been revised five times and has risen to a position of prominence as a guiding statement of ethical principles for doctors involved in medical research. The most recent revision, however, has resulted in considerable controversy, particularly in the area of the ethical requirements surrounding placebo-controlled trials and the question of responsibilities to research participants at the end of a study. This review considers the past versions of the Declaration of Helsinki and asks the question: How exactly has the text of the Declaration changed throughout its lifetime? Regarding the present form of the Declaration of Helsinki we ask: What are the major changes in the most recent revision and what are the controversies surrounding them? Finally, building on the detailed review of the past and present versions of the Declaration of Helsinki, we give consideration to some of the possible future trajectories for the Declaration in the light of its history and standing in the world of the ethics of medical research.


Received 6 November 2003 Accepted 20 January 2004

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02103.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now