If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() British Journal of Clinical PharmacologyVolume 58 Issue 5, Pages 536 - 541 Published Online: 3 Sep 2004 Journal compilation © 2010 The British Pharmacological Society The Journal of The British Pharmacological Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 152K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Comparison of tincture of opium and methadone to control opioid withdrawal in a Thai treatment centre Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd KEYWORDS methadone • opioid withdrawal • Thailand • tincture of opium ABSTRACTAimsTo evaluate the effectiveness of oral tincture of opium (TOP) and methadone to control opioid withdrawal in patients in northern Thailand. MethodsOpen label, parallel group study in an inpatient facility compared 15 former heroin users receiving methadone 5–20 mg 12 hourly with 15 former opium smokers receiving TOP (3.33–10 mg morphine equivalents 12 hourly). At 0, 1, 3 and 8 h, blood, withdrawal scores and subjective opioid effects were collected. ResultsThere was a reciprocal association between withdrawal scores/direct subjective opioid effects and plasma (R)-methadone, but not plasma morphine, concentrations. Withdrawal scores at the time of dosing were higher in the TOP patients (9.1 ± 3) than in the methadone patients (4.5 ± 4.6) and in the TOP patients were significantly (P = 0.001) attenuated at 3 and 8 h. ConclusionsAt the doses used, TOP was inferior to methadone in suppressing withdrawal. It could prove to be a cost effective and valuable drug, but only after dose size and frequency are further investigated. Received 4 November 2003 Accepted 21 April 2004 |