ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 145K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Development, growth, and egg production of Ageneotettix deorum (Orthoptera: Acrididae) in response to spider predation risk and elevated resource quality
Bradford. J. Danner and Anthony Joern *
 School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, U.S.A.
Correspondence to   *Anthony Joern, School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588-0118, U.S.A. E-mail: jjoern1@unl.edu
Copyright Royal Entomological Society, 2004
KEYWORDS
Ageneotettix deorum • compensatory interactions • delayed age of first reproduction • grasshopper • Lycosid wolf spiders • predation risk • sandhills grassland • Schizocosa

ABSTRACT

Abstract. 1. Predation risk to insects is often size- or stage-selective and usually decreases as prey grow. Any factor, such as food quality, that accelerates developmental and growth rates is likely to reduce the period over which prey are susceptible to size-dependent predation.

2. Using field experiments, several hypotheses that assess growth, development, and egg production rates of the rangeland grasshopper Ageneotettix deorum (Scudder) were tested in response to combinations of food quality and predation risk from wolf spiders to investigate performance variation manifested through a behaviourally mediated path affecting food ingestion rates.

3. Grasshoppers with nutritionally superior food completed development ≈ 8–18% faster and grew 15–45% larger in the absence of spiders, in comparison with those subjected to low quality food exposed to spider predators. Growth and development did not differ for grasshoppers feeding on high quality food when predators were present in comparison with lower quality food unimpeded by predators. Responses indicated a compensatory relationship between resource quality and predation risk.

4. Surviving grasshoppers produced fewer eggs compared with individuals not exposed to spiders. Because no differences were found in daily egg production rate regardless of predation treatment, lower egg production was attributed to delayed age of first reproduction. Results compare favourably with responses observed in natural populations.

5. Risk of predation from spiders greatly reduced growth, development, and ultimately egg production. Increased food quality counteracts the impact of predation risk on grasshoppers through compensatory responses, suggesting that bottom-up factors mediate effects of spiders.


Accepted 10 September 2003

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00571.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Virtual Issue
Virtual Issue
Insect Conservation and Diversity
Start reading now

If you have online access to Ecological Entomology…

…you will also have access to the new sister journal, Insect Conservation and Diversity

Click here to start reading now

Sign up here
Journal Backfiles