ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 10253K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Satellite image based vegetation classification of a large area using limited ground reference data: a case study in the Usa Basin, north-east European Russia
Tarmo Virtanen 1 , Kari Mikkola 2 Ari Nikula 2
  1 T. Virtanen, Dept. of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Box 65, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland, tarmo.virtanen@helsinki.fi   2 K. Mikkola & A. Nikula, Rovaniemi Research Station, Finnish Forest Research Institute; Box 16; FI-96301 Rovaniemi, Finland.
Copyright 2003 The Norwegian Polar Institute

ABSTRACT

Predicted global changes can be studied effectively by combining spatially explicit data sets on vegetation and other landscape properties with process models. However, detailed knowledge of the vegetation distribution of remote Arctic areas is relatively scarce. This paper shows how a mesoscale vegetation and land cover classification of a large, remote Arctic area can be conducted at a fine spatial resolution (30 m cell size) using a limited ground reference data set. The study area is the catchment of the River Usa (93 500 km2) in north-eastern European Russia. Vegetation zones in the Usa Basin range from taiga in the south to forest-tundra and tundra in the north, and to alpine in the Ural mountains in the east. Classification was done using a mosaic of spectrally adjusted Landsat TM5 images from five different dates and a semi-supervised method. Ground reference data were collected during the summers of 1998, 1999 and 2000. Accuracy of the 21-class vegetation type/land cover classification produced was tested against test points interpreted from oblique aerial photographs taken from a helicopter (logistic limitations prohibited the collection of representative ground reference data). The main vegetation types (forests, willow dominated stands and meadows, peatlands, tundra heaths, mainly unvegetated areas, and water bodies) were distinguished with relatively high accuracy: 84% of the test points were classified correctly. Spatially detailed land cover data sets like the one described here allow detailed landscape-level analysis and process modelling on many different subjects.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1751-8369.2004.tb00129.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
WIREs Climate Change
Free Online Access
 Permafrost and Periglacial Processes

International Permafrost Association Reports

FREE access to IPA Reports in Permafrost and Periglacial Processes online

View the current issue

Journal Backfiles