ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 114K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

REPORT
When left means right: an explanation of the left cradling bias in terms of right hemisphere specializations
Victoria J. Bourne and Brenda K. Todd
 Department of Psychology, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, UK
Correspondence to   Victoria J. Bourne, Department of Psychology, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QH, UK; e-mail: victoria@sussex.ac.uk
Copyright © Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 2004

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMethodResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementReferences

Previous research has indicated that 70–85% of women and girls show a bias to hold infants, or dolls, to the left side of their body. This bias is not matched in males (e.g. deChateau, Holmberg & Winberg, 1978; Todd, 1995). This study tests an explanation of cradling preferences in terms of hemispheric specialization for the perception of facial emotional expression. Thirty-two right-handed participants were given a behavioural test of lateralization and a cradling task. Females, but not males, who cradled a doll on the left side were found to have significantly higher laterality quotients than right cradlers. Results indicate that women cradle on the side of the body that is contralateral to the hemisphere dominant for face and emotion processing and suggest a possible explanation of gender differences in the incidence of cradling.


Received: 2 August 2002 Accepted: 10 December 2002

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00318.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign-up for Content Alerts
Developmental Psychology