ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of Applied Microbiology

Journal of Applied Microbiology

Volume 97 Issue 2, Pages 362 - 370

Published Online: 17 May 2004

Journal compilation © 2010 The Society for Applied Microbiology



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 111K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The prevalence and concentration of Escherichia coli O157 in faeces of cattle from different production systems at slaughter
N. Fegan, P. Vanderlinde, G. Higgs and P. Desmarchelier
Microbiology Section, Food Science Australia, Tingalpa DC, Queensland, Australia
Correspondence to Narelle Fegan, Microbiology Section, Food Science Australia, PO Box 3312, Tingalpa DC, Queensland, 4173 Australia
(e-mail: narelle.fegan@foodscience.afisc.csiro.au)
.
Copyright 2004 The Society for Applied Microbiology
KEYWORDS
cattle • E. coli O157 • enumeration • grass-fed • lot-fed • prevalence • production systems • pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
n. fegan, p. vanderlinde, g. higgs and p. desmarchelier. 2004.

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMaterials and methodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgementsReferences

Aims: To determine the prevalence and concentration of Escherichia coli O157 shed in faeces at slaughter, by beef cattle from different production systems.

Methods and Results: Faecal samples were collected from grass-fed (pasture) and lot-fed (feedlot) cattle at slaughter and tested for the presence of E. coli O157 using automated immunomagnetic separation (AIMS). Escherichia coli O157 was enumerated in positive samples using the most probable number (MPN) technique and AIMS and total E. coli were enumerated using Petrifilm. A total of 310 faecal samples were tested (155 from each group). The geometric mean count of total E. coli was 5 × 105 and 2·5 × 105 CFU g−1 for lot- and grass-fed cattle, respectively. Escherichia coli O157 was isolated from 13% of faeces with no significant difference between grass-fed (10%) and lot-fed cattle (15%). The numbers of E. coli O157 in cattle faeces varied from undetectable (<3 MPN g−1) to 1·1 × 105 MPN g−1. Twenty-six (67%) of 39 O157 positive faeces had <10 MPN g−1 and three (8%) had counts between 103–105 MPN g−1. There was no significant difference between concentrations of E. coli O157 in the faeces of grass-fed or lot-fed cattle.

Conclusion: The prevalence and numbers of E. coli O157 in the faeces of cattle at slaughter were not affected by the production systems evaluated in this study.

Significance and Impact of the Study: Information on the prevalence and numbers of E. coli O157 can be used for formulating intervention strategies and in quantitative risk assessments.


2003/1167: received 18 December 2003, revised 2 April 2004 and accepted 5 April 2004

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02300.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
Influenza
 NAME OF HEADING
Click here to find out more
E-mail alerts
Sign up for e-alerts
Asia Scientists Click Here
Journal Backfiles