If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||||||||||
![]() Ecology LettersVolume 7 Issue 2, Pages 135 - 145 Published Online: 4 Feb 2004 Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS Published on behalf of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 446K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking REPORT Shifting baselines and the decline of pelagic sharks in the Gulf of Mexico Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS KEYWORDS Fisheries • generalized linear model • marine • overexploitation • pelagic shark assemblage • population • predator • restoration Abstract
Historical abundances of many large marine vertebrates were tremendously greater than today. However, while pelagic sharks are known to have declined rapidly in the northwest Atlantic in recent years, there, as elsewhere, little is known about the former natural abundances of these species. Here, we compare initial (1950s) and recent (late-1990s) standardized catch rates of pelagic sharks in the Gulf of Mexico, the area where methods of exploitation between these two periods were most comparable. We estimate that oceanic whitetip and silky sharks, formerly the most commonly caught shark species, have declined by over 99 and 90%, respectively. That the former prevalence of oceanic whitetip sharks in this ecosystem is unrecognized today is clear evidence of shifting baselines. Our analysis provides the missing baseline for pelagic sharks in the Gulf of Mexico that is needed for the rational management and restoration of these species. Editor, E. McCauley Manuscript received 9 October 2003 First decision made 16 November 2003 Manuscript accepted 2 December 2003 |
|
|
Click here to ‘Become a Fan’ of Ecology Letters on FaceBook.
![]() |