ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 78K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Asking New Questions about the Partition of the Indian Subcontinent
Yasmin Khan 1
  1 St. Antony's College, Oxford
Copyright © Blackwell Publishing 2004

Abstract

AbstractNotesBibliography

Fierce historical controversy has raged over the causes of the partition of India, ever since Pakistan was created in 1947. This article briefly analyses these debates, but here the major focus is upon the consequences of partition and the new wave of historiography which has emerged in recent years, especially since the fiftieth anniversary of partition in 1997. These new histories have centred upon the experience of ordinary people, and have emphasised the trauma caused by widespread violence and mass migration. This article questions why these histories of violence have struggled to find their place in a more comprehensive and integrated narrative of the events of 1947, and why a gulf still separates the 'popular' and the 'political' in partition histories.


History Compass 2 (2004)AS 090,1 -10

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1478-0542.2004.00090.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member