If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Journal of Social IssuesVolume 59 Issue 2, Pages 431 - 453 Published Online: 29 Apr 2003 © 2009 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues Published on behalf of The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 119K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Social and Political Dimensions of Privacy This article draws for its opening sections and at other points on my 1967 book, Privacy and Freedom, and the manuscript of a forthcoming volume I have edited, tentatively titled: Privacy and Freedom Updated: Social Science Perspectives on Privacy. Copyright 2003 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues ABSTRACTThis article provides a framework for analyzing privacy in modern societies, defining information privacy and describing three levels that structure the values assigned to privacy. After describing a contemporary privacy baseline (1945–1960), these concepts are applied to social and political privacy developments in three contemporary eras of steadily growing privacy concerns and societal responses across citizen-government, employee-employer, and consumer-business relationships in 1961–1979, 1980–1989, and 1990–2002. Each period is described in terms of new technology applications, changing social climates, and organizational and legal developments. Effects of the 9/11 terrorist attacks on privacy balances are analyzed and predictions for future privacy developments are presented. The relationship of articles in this issue to the author's framework is noted throughout. |