ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 176K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur
James H. McCutchan, Jr, William M. Lewis, Jr, Carol Kendall and Claire C. McGrath,
Correspondence to J. H. McCutchan, W. M. Lewis, and C. C. McGrath, Center for Limnology, Cooperative Inst. for Research in Environmental Sciences, Univ. of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 80309-0216, USA (mccutchanj@cires.colorado.edu). – J. H. M. also: Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Box AB, Millbrook, New York, 12545-0129, USA. – C. Kendall, U. S. Geological Survey, 345 Middlefield Road, Menlo Park, California 94025-0434, USA.
Copyright OIKOS

ABSTRACT

Use of stable isotope ratios to trace pathways of organic matter among consumers requires knowledge of the isotopic shift between diet and consumer. Variation in trophic shift among consumers can be substantial. For data from the published literature and supplementary original data (excluding fluid-feeding consumers), the mean isotopic shift for C was +0.5±0.13‰ rather than 0.0‰, as commonly assumed. The shift for C was higher for consumers analyzed as muscle (+1.3±0.30‰) than for consumers analyzed whole (+0.3±0.14‰). Among consumers analyzed whole, the trophic shift for C was lower for consumers acidified prior to analysis (−0.2±0.21‰) than for unacidified samples (+0.5±0.17‰). For N, trophic shift was lower for consumers raised on invertebrate diets (+1.4±0.21‰) than for consumers raised on other high-protein diets (+3.3±0.26‰) and was intermediate for consumers raised on plant and algal diets (+2.2±0.30‰). The trophic shift for S differed between high-protein (+2.0±0.65‰) and low-protein diets (-0.5±0.56‰). Thus, methods of analysis and dietary differences can affect trophic shift for consumers; the utility of stable isotope methods can be improved if this information is incorporated into studies of trophic relationships. Although few studies of stable isotope ratios have considered variation in the trophic shift, such variation is important because small errors in estimates of trophic shift can result in large errors in estimates of the contribution of sources to consumers or in estimates of trophic position.


Manuscript Accepted 18 February 2003

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12098.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information

from the Wiley-Blackwell Life Sciences Team

Join Twitter for our News Updates
Per Brinck Oikos Award
Sign up here