ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association

JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volume 39 Issue 4, Pages 841 - 849

Published Online: 8 Jun 2007

© 2010 American Water Resources Association



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 109K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

A STATISTICAL APPROACH FOR PERFORMING WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENT ASSESSMENTS1
Robert D. Gibbons 2
 

1 Paper No. 02070 of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association.

 

2 Professor of Biostatistics, Director of the Center for Health Statistics, University of Illinois at Chicago, 1601 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60612 (E-Mail: rdgib@uic.edu).

Copyright 2003 American Water Resources Association
KEYWORDS
statistical analysis • water quality • TMDL • confidence intervals • statistical intervals • upper percentiles • environmental monitoring

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: A statistical approach for making Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) impairment decisions is developed as an alternative to the simple tally of the number of measurements that happen to exceed the standard. The method ensures that no more than a small (e.g., 10 percent) percentage of water quality samples will exceed a regulatory standard with a high level of confidence (e.g., 95 percent). The method is based on the 100(1-α) percent lower confidence limit on an upper percentile of the concentration distribution. Advantages of the method include: (1) it provides a direct test of the hypothesis that a prespecified percentage of the true concentration distribution exceeds a regulatory standard, (2) it is applicable to a wide variety of different statistical concentration distributions, (3) it directly incorporates the magnitude of the measured concentrations unlike traditional approaches, and (4) it has explicit statistical power characteristics (i.e., what is the probability of missing an environmental impact). Detailed study of the simple tally approach reveals that it achieves high statistical power at the expense of unacceptably high false positive rates (30 to 40 percent false positive results). By contrast, the statistical approach results in similar statistical power while achieving a nominal false positive rate of 5 percent.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2003.tb04409.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


E-toc
Sign up here
WIREs Climate Change
Special Issue
Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Read the Editor's Choice Virtual Issue from JAWRA

Read the issue for free

Also of Interest
Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education

Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education

Click here for Free Access

SCIN