If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||
![]() Global Ecology and BiogeographySee Also: Volume 11 Issue 6, Pages 453 - 462 Published Online: 28 Jun 2008 Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 531K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland Copyright Blackwell Science, 2002 KEYWORDS artificial neural network • bioclimate envelopes • Britain • climate change • conservation • habitats • Ireland • SPECIES model ABSTRACT
AimClimate change has the potential to have significant impacts on the distribution of species and on the composition of habitats. This paper identifies the potential changes in the future distribution of species under the UKCIP98 climate change scenarios, in order that such changes can be taken into account in conservation management. LocationThe model was applied to Britain and Ireland. MethodsA model based on an artificial neural network was used to predict the changing bioclimate envelopes of species in Britain and Ireland. Fifty-four species representing 15 habitats were modelled. ResultsThe modelled species could be placed into three categories: those losing suitable climate space, those gaining it, and those showing little or no change. When the species were associated with habitats it was found that Arctic–Alpine/montane heath communities were the most sensitive to climate change, followed by pine woodland and beech woodland in southern England. In lowland heath, wet heath, cereal field margins, coastal grazing marsh, drought-prone acid grassland and calcareous grassland, the species either showed little change or an increase in suitable climate space. The other eight habitats showed a mixed response. ConclusionsThe species show a variety of responses to climate change and thus their current habitat associations may alter. The uncertain future of some species and habitats is highlighted. Conservation policy and practice will need to be revised in the face of climate change. |