If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Analyses of Social Issues and Public PolicyVolume 3 Issue 1, Pages 171 - 176 Published Online: 4 Dec 2003 © 2009 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues Published on behalf of the Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 48K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Avoiding the Pitfalls of Politicized Psychology Copyright 2002 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues ABSTRACTThis article provides two arguments for using caution when interpreting the results of a Global Change Game simulation indicating that people high in right-wing authoritarianism are particularly likely to bring the world to ruin. First, we review research that demonstrates that extremists on both the political left and right share characteristics likely to be associated with poor performance in the Global Change Game (e.g., lower levels of integrative complexity) and that there are reasons to be cautious about letting political extremists on either the left or right inherit the earth. Second, we caution that political psychologists need to be aware of how their own values shape the types of research they conduct and the inferences they draw from that research and that the same results can be construed very differently depending on the lens through which they are viewed. |