ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 235K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Transforming Breach of Confidence? Towards a Common Law Right of Privacy under the Human Rights Act
Gavin Phillipson *

  * University of Durham. Earlier versions of this paper were delivered at the launch of the Durham University Human Rights Centre on 20 October 2001, and in the first seminar of the Centre's AHRB-funded series on Judicial Reasoning under the Human Rights Act, held at Allen and Overy on 31 March 2003. The author would like to thank Lord Justice Sedley, who chaired the first session and replied to the author in the second, and the participants in both of them for their very helpful comments in the ensuing discussion. Grateful thanks are also due to the very helpful suggestions of the anonymous referees.

Copyright © The Modern Law Review Limited 2003

ABSTRACT

This article examines the development of a remedy for unauthorised publication of personal information that has resulted from the fusion of breach of confidence with the limited 'horizontal' application of Article 8 of the ECHR via the Human Rights Act. Its analysis of Strasbourg and domestic post-HRA case law reveals the extent to which confidence has in some areas been radically transformed into a privacy right in all but name; however it also seeks to expose the analytical and normative tensions that arise in the judgments between the values of confidentiality and privacy as overlapping but not coterminous concepts, due in part to the failure to resolve decisively the horizontal effect conundrum. This judicial ambivalence towards the reception of privacy as a legal right into English law may, it will argue, also be seen in the prevailing judicial approach to the resolution of the conflict between privacy and expression interests which, it will suggest, is both normatively and structurally inadequate.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/1468-2230.6605003 About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


IT'S TIME TO RENEW

MLR

It’s time to renew your subscription to Modern Law Review.

Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online.

Law