If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Family RelationsVolume 52 Issue 4, Pages 332 - 339 Published Online: 12 Feb 2004 © 2009 by the National Council on Family Relations Published on behalf of the National Council on Family Relations
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 80K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Reconciling Divergent Perspectives: Judith Wallerstein, Quantitative Family Research, and Children of Divorce Copyright 2003 National Council on Family Relations KEYWORDS children • divorce • marital discord • methodology • parent-child relationships • psychological well-being ABSTRACTAlthough Judith Wallerstein's research on children with divorced parents has been influential, many quantitative family scholars have criticized her methods and conclusions. Wallerstein claims that children with divorced parents often reach adulthood as psychologically troubled individuals who find it difficult to maintain stable and satisfying relationships with others. Consistent with Wallerstein's claims, quantitative research suggests that parental divorce increases the risk of experiencing psychological problems, having a discordant marriage, seeing one's own marriage end in divorce, and having weak ties to parents (especially fathers) in adulthood. The accumulated evidence, however, reveals that the estimated effects of divorce are not as strong as Wallerstein appears to claim. I provide examples from the Marital Instability Over the Life Course study to illustrate the magnitude of divorce effects. I conclude with a call for a rapprochement between Wallerstein and her critics. |