If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||
![]() Journal of Intellectual Disability ResearchVolume 47 Issue s1, Pages 72 - 83 Published Online: 30 Sep 2003 Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 133K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Diagnosis and classification of eating disorders in adults with intellectual disability: the Diagnostic Criteria for Psychiatric Disorders for Use with Adults with Learning Disabilities/Mental Retardation (DC-LD) approach Copyright 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd KEYWORDS eating disorders • psychiatric assessment • classification/ diagnostic criteria • aetiology/ comorbidity • service research Abstract
Background Previous classifications of eating disorders [EDs] employed a narrower concept of EDs. They did not include the wide range of abnormal eating behaviours [AEBs], persistent feeding disorders and EDs psychopathology, aetiological and comorbidity factors seen in adults with intellectual disability [ID]. Methods The International Classification of Diseases − 10 [ICD-10], ICD-10-MR, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual − IV [DSM-IV] and Diagnostic Criteria for Psychiatric Disorders for Use with Adults with Learning Disabilities/Mental Retardation[DC-LD] diagnostic approaches to EDs in adults with ID are compared. Results The DC-LD encourages conceptually clearer and systematic hierarchical differential diagnostic classification of AEBs and EDs. The DC-LD also allows consideration of relevant aetiological and comorbidity issues. DC-LD-based multi-axial case formulation supports the multimodal clinical assessment of AEBs and EDs. Conclusions Further research should develop similar systematic and evidence-based multicomponent clinical diagnostic, management and service models for adults with ID and EDs. |