ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Allergy

Allergy

Volume 57 Issue 6, Pages 534 - 537

Published Online: 17 May 2002

Journal compilation © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 84K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Short communication
Comparison of cetirizine, ebastine and loratadine in the treatment of immediate mosquito-bite allergy
A. Karppinen 1 , H. Kautiainen 2 , L. Petman 3 , P. Burri 1 , T. Reunala 1,3
  1 Department of Dermatology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere,   2 Rheumatism Foundation Hospital, Heinola,   3 University Hospital for Skin and Allergic Diseases, Helsinki, Finland
Correspondence to T. Reunala, MD, Department of Dermatology, Tampere University Hospital, PO Box 2000, FIN-33521 Tampere, Finland
Copyright Copyright © Munksgaard 2002
KEYWORDS
Aedes mosquitoes • allergy • antihistamines • pruritus • whealing

ABSTRACT

Background: People frequently experience whealing and delayed papules from mosquito bites. Whealing is mediated by antisaliva immunoglobulin (Ig)E antibodies and histamine. Cetirizine, ebastine and loratadine have earlier shown effects on mosquito-bite reactions but no comparative studies exist.

Methods: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study was performed with cetirizine 10 mg, ebastine 10 mg and loratadine 10 mg in 29 mosquito-bite-sensitive adults exposed to Aedes aegypti mosquito-bites. The size of the bite lesion and the intensity of pruritus (visual analog scale) were measured at 15 min and 2, 6 and 24 h.

Results: Cetirizine and ebastine, but not loratadine, decreased significantly the size of whealing (P < 0.01) and accompanying pruritus (P < 0.001) compared to placebo. Cetirizine was most effective on pruritus but caused more often sedation than ebastine or loratadine. The delayed bite symptoms remained too faint for any statistical comparison.

Conclusion: This comparative study in mosquito-bite-sensitive adults shows that cetirizine and ebastine decrease significantly whealing and accompanying pruritus, and that cetirizine seems to be the most effective against pruritus.


Accepted for publication 4 October 2001

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1034/j.1398-9995.2002.13201.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now