ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 94K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Limitations of the Gail Model in the Specialized Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Clinic
David M. Euhus, MD 1 , A. Marilyn Leitch, MD 1 , James F. Huth, MD 1 , and George N. Peters, MD 1
 The University of Texas Southwestern Center for Breast Care, Dallas, Texas
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: The University of Texas Southwestern Center for Breast Care, E6.222, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390-9155, U.S.A., or e-mail: david.euhus@utsouthwestern.edu
Copyright 2002 Blackwell Publishing Inc.
KEYWORDS
breast cancer • risk assessment • Gail model • Claus model • BRCAPRO

ABSTRACT

The Gail model is a risk assessment tool that is accurate for general breast cancer risk screening. Because of the limited way that this model incorporates family history information, however, there are concerns that it may underestimate risk for many women attending specialized breast cancer risk assessment clinics. We collected comprehensive breast cancer risk factor information for 213 women attending a specialized breast cancer risk assessment clinic using a modified version of the CancerGene software. Breast cancer risk was calculated using the models of Gail and Claus as well as BRCAPRO and the tables of Bodian (for women with lobular neoplasia). Eighty-six percent of the women had a family history of breast cancer. Although 74% of women had risk factor histories that are thought to confound the Gail model (family history of breast cancer in second-degree relatives, family history of breast cancer before the age of 50, family history of bilateral breast cancer, family history of ovarian cancer, or personal history of lobular neoplasia), the inclusion of other models increased the risk level assignment in only 13% of the cases. We conclude that the Gail model is an appropriate risk assessment tool for most women attending specialized clinics, although the inclusion of models better able to account for family history information and personal history of lobular neoplasia is required to accommodate all women.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1524-4741.2002.08005.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information
TBJ Impact Factor

Latest News & Information
TBJ Survey

Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now