ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association

JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Volume 38 Issue 1, Pages 173 - 186

Published Online: 8 Jun 2007

© 2010 American Water Resources Association



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 204K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

FLOOD STAGE FORECASTING WITH SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES1
Shie-Yui Liong, Chandrasekaran Sivapragasam 2
 

1 Paper No. 01047 of the Journal of the American Water Resources Association.Discussions are open until October 1, 2002.

 

2 Respectively, Associate Professor and Research Scholar, Department of Civil Engineering, National University of Singapore, 10 Kent Ridge Crescent, Singapore 119260 (E-Mail/Liong: cvelsy@nus.edu.sg).

Copyright 2002 American Water Resources Association
KEYWORDS
structural risk minimization • support vector machines • flood forecasting • neural networks

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Machine learning techniques are finding more and more applications in the field of forecasting. A novel regression technique, called Support Vector Machine (SVM), based on the statistical learning theory is explored in this study. SVM is based on the principle of Structural Risk Minimization as opposed to the principle of Empirical Risk Minimization espoused by conventional regression techniques. The flood data at Dhaka, Bangladesh, are used in this study to demonstrate the forecasting capabilities of SVM. The result is compared with that of Artificial Neural Network (ANN) based model for one-lead day to seven-lead day forecasting. The improvements in maximum predicted water level errors by SVM over ANN for four-lead day to seven-lead day are 9.6 cm, 22.6 cm, 4.9 cm and 15.7 cm, respectively. The result shows that the prediction accuracy of SVM is at least as good as and in some cases (particularly at higher lead days) actually better than that of ANN, yet it offers advantages over many of the limitations of ANN, for example in arriving at ANN's optimal network architecture and choosing useful training set. Thus, SVM appears to be a very promising prediction tool.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01544.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


E-toc
Sign up here
WIREs Climate Change
Special Issue
Journal of the American Water Resources Association

Journal of the American Water Resources Association
Read the Editor's Choice Virtual Issue from JAWRA

Read the issue for free

Also of Interest
Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education

Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education

Click here for Free Access

SCIN