ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Restoration Ecology

Restoration Ecology

Volume 10 Issue 1, Pages 88 - 95

Published Online: 5 Apr 2002

© 2010 Society for Ecological Restoration International



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 185K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Seedling Survival from Locally and Commercially Obtained Seeds on Two Semiarid Sites
L. David Humphrey 1,2,3 Eugene W. Schupp 1
  1 Department of Rangeland Resources and the Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322, U.S.A.
3 Address correspondence to L. D. Humphrey, email ldavidhu@yahoo.com
 

2 Current address: 1437 Hillcrest Drive, Buford, GA 30518, U.S.A.

Copyright 2002 Society for Ecological Restoration
KEYWORDS
Bromus tectorum, cheatgrass, Chrysothamnus, Elymus, Ephedra, local adaptation, Pascopyrum, persistent seed bank, Pseudoroegneria, Stipa, seedling survival, shrub-steppe

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionAcknowledgmentsLITERATURE CITED

Local populations of plants are likely to be better adapted to a site than populations from elsewhere. Thus, local seeds should yield higher survival in restoration attempts than commercial seed stocks. We compared seedling survival from locally and commercially obtained seeds of seven species, Pseudoroegneria spicata (bluebunch wheatgrass), Elymus elymoides (squirreltail), Pascopyrum smithii (western wheatgrass), Stipa hymenoides (Indian ricegrass), Stipa comata (needle-and-thread), Chrysothamnus nauseosus (rubber rabbitbrush) and Ephedra nevadensis (Mormon tea) over three years on two sites in Utah (Dugway and Tintic) that were dominated by the introduced annual Bromus tectorum (cheatgrass). At the Dugway site we included burned and unburned seedbed treatments. For all species at Dugway, seedling survival to the first summer was higher on burned plots where B. tectorum densities were greatly reduced. First-year seedling survival was 20–30% for most species on the Dugway burned plots and at Tintic. At the drier Dugway site, only S. hymenoides and Ephedra had substantial third-year survival. Elymus and Pascopyrum survived to the third year only at the moister Tintic site. Survival to the third year was less than 3% for all species except S. comata (6% survival), and densities were low (0.2–1.0 plants/m2). However, third-year plants were well established and the grasses flowered. Pseudoroegneria and Ephedra at Dugway (on burned plots) and S. comata and Elymus at Tintic had higher first-year survival or higher survival based on survival curves from local than from commercial seeds. However, final survival was never significantly higher, although such a trend was suggested. Seed dormancy traits could also provide advantages to local populations, and we observed differences in dormancy between local and commercial S. comata and S. hymenoides seeds that may be an example.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1526-100X.2002.10109.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


REC
REC
Sign up here