If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() British Journal of DermatologyVolume 144 Issue 3, Pages 575 - 579 Published Online: 23 Dec 2001 Journal compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists An Official Journal of the British Association of Dermatologists
Abstract | References | Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 420K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Photodynamic therapy of acne vulgaris with topical δ-aminolaevulinic acid and incoherent light in Japanese patients Copyright British Association of Dermatologists, 2001 KEYWORDS acne vulgaris •
δ-aminolaevulinic acid • peeling • photodynamic therapy ABSTRACTBackground Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is useful for treatment of epidermal neoplasia but may also have a role in the treatment of inflammatory dermatoses. Objectives To study the effect of PDT in patients with acne.
Methods
Three men and 10 women who suffered from intractable acne vulgaris were treated using PDT with topical δ-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) and polychromatic visible light. Twenty per cent ALA in an oil-in-water emulsion was applied to the lesions for 4 h with a light-shielding dressing. The lesions were then exposed to polychromatic visible light at 600–700 nm using a halogen light source of energy intensity 17 mW cm Results All patients had apparent improvement of facial appearance and reduction of new acne lesions at 1, 3 and 6 months following PDT treatment. The adverse effects were discomfort, burning and stinging during irradiation, oedematous erythema for 3 days after PDT, epidermal exfoliation from the fourth to the 10th day, irritation and hypersensitivity to physical stimulation for 10 days after PDT, and pigmentation or erythema after epidermal exfoliation; the treated lesions returned to normal skin conditions within 1 month. Conclusions PDT was beneficial in the treatment of acne. As a photoactivating light source, polychromatic visible light was thought to be better for use with acne patients than laser light because of its cost-effectiveness, uniform illumination and time-efficiency in treating large areas. Accepted for publication 13 October 2000 |