ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

British Journal of Dermatology

British Journal of Dermatology

Volume 145 Issue 1, Pages 28 - 31

Published Online: 23 Dec 2001

Journal compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 293K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

A retrospective analysis of contact allergy to lanolin
S.H. Wakelin H. Smith I.R. White R.J.G. Rycroft and J.P. Mcfadden
  St John's Institute of Dermatology, London, U.K.
Correspondence: Dr Sarah H.Wakelin, St Mary's Hospital, Paddington, London W2 1NY, U.K.
Copyright British Association of Dermatologists
KEYWORDS
allergic contact dermatitis • cosmetic allergy • lanolin • patch testing • wool alcohols

ABSTRACT

Background  Lanolin is often stated to be an important sensitizer but some of the available literature is based on the analysis of high-risk patients.Objectives  To analyse the frequency of contact allergy to lanolin (wool alcohols) in a central London teaching hospital patch-test population.Methods  Review of 24,449 patients recorded on our database during 1982–96 who were tested with a standard series containing 30% wool alcohols.Results  The mean annual rate of sensitivity to this allergen was 1·7%. The wool alcohols-allergic group contained a higher proportion of females (P < 0·05), and the mean age of both males and females (48·4 and 49·2 years) was higher than that of non-wool alcohols-allergic patients (41·4 and 35·9 years; P < 0·0005). There was no difference in atopic eczema status between these groups. The highest prevalence of allergy to wool alcohols was among patients with lower leg dermatitis (6·0%; 95% confidence interval, CI 4·46–7·54), followed by those with anogenital dermatitis (3·23%; 95% CI 1·81–4·65). There was an unexplained decline in the rate of positive patch tests to Amerchol® L-101. However, some patients who reacted to this were negative with wool alcohols, so it may be a useful additional test reagent. The mean rates of allergy to Eucerin® (0·65% per annum) and 50% hydrogenated lanolin in petrolatum (1% per annum) were low, and we no longer use these as test reagents.Conclusions  This study illustrates that lanolin sensitization has remained at a relatively low and constant rate even in a high-risk population (i.e. patients with recent or active eczema).


Accepted for publication 23 February 2001

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04277.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter