ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 554K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Original Papers
Antihypertensive Efficacy of Candesartan in Comparison to Losartan: The CLAIM Study
George Bakris, MD; 1 Alan Gradman, MD; 2 Max Reif, MD; 3 Marian Wofford, MD; 4 Mark Munger, PharmD; 5 Susan Harris, MS; 6 Jennifer Vendetti, BS; 6 Eric L. Michelson, MD; 6 Rebecca Wang, MD; 6 and the CLAIM Study Investigators
 From the Departments of Preventive Medicine and Internal Medicine, Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL;1  University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA;2  University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH;3  University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS;4  Department of Pharmacy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT;5 and  AstraZeneca LP, Chesterbrook, PA6
Correspondence to   Rebecca Wang, MD, 725 Chesterbrook Blvd, D3W, Wayne, PA 19087-5677
Copyright 2001 by Le Jacq Communications, Inc.

(J Clin Hypertens. 2001;3:16–21)

ABSTRACT

An 8-week, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, forced-titration study was conducted to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy of candesartan vs. losartan in 654 hypertensive patients with a diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 114 mm Hg from 72 sites throughout the U.S. Eligible patients were randomized to candesartan cilexetil 16 mg once daily, or losartan 50 mg once daily. Two weeks following randomization, patients doubled the respective doses of their angiotensin receptor blockers for an additional 6 weeks. At week 8, candesartan cilexetil lowered trough systolic/diastolic blood pressure by a significantly greater amount than did losartan (13.3/10.9 mm Hg with candesartan cilexetil vs. 9.8/8.7 mm Hg with losartan; p< 0.001). At the same period, candesartan cilexetil also lowered peak blood pressure by a significantly greater amount than did losartan (15.2 to 11.6 mm Hg with candesartan cilexetil vs. 12.6 to 10.1 mm Hg with losartan; p< 0.05). There were statistically significantly (p< 0.05) higher proportions of responders and controlled patients in the candesartan cilexetil group (62.4% and 56.0%, respectively) than in the losartan group (54.0% and 46.9%, respectively). Both treatment regimens were well tolerated; 1.8% in the candesartan cilexetil group and 1.6% in the losartan group withdrew because of adverse events. In conclusion, this forced-titration study confirms that candesartan cilexetil is more effective than losartan in lowering blood pressure when both are administered once daily at maximum doses. Both drugs were well tolerated.


Manuscript received August 25, 2000; accepted September 27, 2000

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1524-6175.2001.00826.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Announcing

JCH now includes The Journal of the CardioMetabolic Syndrome.

Each month read current issues on the JCH site.

For past issues, click here.

Free Issue

Read archived issues of our FREE Cardiology NewsWire

Latest News and Information

Get 6 free issues of breaking news and research delivered to your inbox each year!

Register now

Announcing
ASH

Members log in here to access the full-text and archived issues of JCH

Not a member? Join now.

Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now