ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Fiscal Studies

Fiscal Studies

Volume 22 Issue 4, Pages 403 - 456

Published Online: 2 Feb 2005

© Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2009



Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 399K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Public and private spending for environmental protection: a cross-country policy analysis
David Pearce* Charles Palmer*
  *Department of Economics and Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University College London.
Copyright Institute for Fiscal Studies, 2001
KEYWORDS
Q28 • environmental protection • public and private spending

Abstract

AbstractREFERENCES

OECD data are used to investigate public and private environmental expenditures and, although they are more complete and consistent than other datasets, they are still poor. This is important in the context of measuring the benefits of environmental protection, when little is really known about its actual costs. Despite these limitations, this study demonstrates that there has been no shift towards an increasing private sector burden relative to the public sector over time. The paper also finds little evidence to show that environmental expenditures negatively impact on economic growth, although there is inconsistency between the 'no effects' finding of the competitiveness literature and the 'negative effects' finding of most of the productivity literature. Finally, the elasticity of expenditure with respect to income is found to be 1.2, lower than would be expected if the 'environmental demand effect' is significant in explaining the downward slope of the environmental Kuznets curve.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1475-5890.2001.tb00048.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Fiscal Studies