ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Agricultural Economics

Agricultural Economics

Volume 24 Issue 2, Pages 221 - 228

Published Online: 9 Aug 2005

© 2010 International Association of Agricultural Economists



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 684K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Strategies and impact of agro-allied parastatals reform in Nigeria
Ph.D. Ade S. Olomola (Associate Research Professor)* 1
  1 Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research (NISER), P.M.B. 5, U. I. P.O., Ibadan, Nigeria
Correspondence to   *Tel.: +234-2-810-2904; fax: +234-2-810-1194. E-mail address: olomola@niser.org.ng (A.S. Olomola).
Copyright 2001 Elsevier B.V.
KEYWORDS
Agricultural parastatals • Privatization • Liberalization

Abstract

AbstractReferences

This study examines the reform of agro-allied parastatals in Nigeria and determine the impact financially, economically and socially. Three enterprises, Flour Mills of Nigeria Limited (FMNL), Okitipupa Oil Palm Company (OOPC) and Nichemtex Industries Limited (NIL), were privatized in Nigeria under a reform programme aimed at improving the performance of agribusinesses in the country. The exercise was successfully conducted through public offer of shares and private placement. The reform led to an improvement in profitability, productivity, financial leverage and liquidity position of the enterprises. The social impact of privatization was also favourable. It has no adverse consequences on job security, level of employment and participation of employees in trade union matters. Successful implementation of the reform was due to several factors including high level of professional competence and dedication of officials connected with the reform, a high degree of transparency and strict compliance with laid down guidelines. At the enterprise level, the positive changes recorded by the enterprises came about through the adoption of a number of coping strategies such as the maintenance of diverse product mix, expansion of export potentials and upgrading of product quality, improved marketing management, technological restructuring and improved techniques of sourcing raw materials. At the macro level, some policy actions such as trade policy reforms and price liberalization also played significant role in enhancing the performance of the enterprises after privatization.


Received 1 March 1999; received in revised form 21 January 2000; accepted 27 March 2000

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00025.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Also of Interest
AGEC

Agricultural Economics

Click here to access a FREE sample issue.

Become a new member!

Canadian Agricultural Economics Society

Benefits include a supscription to Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie.

Click here for details.