If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||
![]() World EconomyVolume 24 Issue 3, Pages 359 - 378 Published Online: 17 Dec 2002 Journal compilation © 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract | Full Text: PDF (Size: 112K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking An Explanation of the International Variation in the Prevalence of Child Labour Copyright Blackwell Publishers Ltd 2001 KEYWORDS international organizations • cooperation • clubs • regional trade agreements ABSTRACTIt is hypothesized that the institutional acceptability of child labor will be more prevalent when the other members of a society gain from its use. Therefore, the cross-country variation in the prevalence of child labor depends on the degree to which child labor affects the welfare of the remaining members of a society. It is demonstrated theoretically that the non-child-labor factors gain from child labor when the economy is closed. As an economy becomes more open to international trade, those gains diminish and even turn negative as the size of the economy increases. Child labor will not exist in capital abundant countries since, in them, child labor makes the non-child-labor factors worse off. It is shown empirically that the cross-country prevalence of child labor falls with increases in a nation's per capita income, its openness to trade, and its economic size. It is argued that trade sanctions, as a remedy for child labor, may be counter-productive since an open economy reduces the benefits of child labor to the other members of a society, and thereby reduces the society's incentive to allow child labor. The model also demonstrates that the economic changes brought on by democracy undermine the practice of child labor. |
| |||||||||