If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Personnel PsychologyVolume 54 Issue 2, Pages 297 - 330 Published Online: 7 Dec 2006 ©2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 1950K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking ETHNIC GROUP DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY IN EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS: A META-ANALYSIS The authors thank Mary-Ann Carter-Taylor, Michael Crino, Gene Galluscio, Tom Lee, Gene Stone-Romero, Frank Schmidt, and two anonymous reviewers for their comments on previous drafts of the manuscript. Special thanks also to Malcolm Ree and John Welsh for their help in providing relevant studies for our analysis. Copyright 2001 Personnel Psychology, Inc. ABSTRACTThe cognitive ability levels of different ethnic groups have interested psychologists for over a century. Many narrative reviews of the empirical literature in the area focus on the Black-White differences, and the reviews conclude that the mean difference in cognitive ability (g) is approximately 1 standard deviation; that is, the generally accepted effect size is about 1.0. We conduct a meta-analytic review that suggests that the one standard deviation effect size accurately summarizes Black-White differences for college application tests (e.g., SAT) and overall analyses of tests of g for job applicants in corporate settings. However, the 1 standard deviation summary of group differences fails to capture many of the complexities in estimating ethnic group differences in employment settings. For example, our results indicate that job complexity, the use of within job versus across job study design, focus on applicant versus incumbent samples, and the exact construct of interest are important moderators of standardized group differences. In many instances, standardized group differences are less than 1 standard deviation. We conduct similar analyses for Hispanics, when possible, and note that Hispanic-White differences are somewhat less than Black-White differences. |