ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Evolution

Evolution

Volume 54 Issue 1, Pages 21 - 29

Published Online: 9 May 2007

© 2010, Society for the Study of Evolution



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 114K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

REINFORCEMENT AND THE GENETICS OF NONRANDOM MATING
Maria R. Servedio 1 1
  1 Department of Zoology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas 78712 and Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Corson Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853
 

1 Present address: Center for Population Biology, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California 95616–8554; E-mail: mrservedio@ucdavis.edu.

Copyright 2000 The Society for the Study of Evolution
KEYWORDS
Assortative mating • isolating mechanisms • models • preferences • reinforcement • speciation

ABSTRACT

Abstract.—The occurrence of reinforcement is compared when premating isolation is caused by the spread of a gene causing females to prefer to mate with males carrying a population-specific trait (a "preference" model) and by a gene that causes females to prefer to mate with males that share their own trait phenotype (an "assortative mating" model). Both two-island models, which have symmetric gene flow, and continent-island models, which have one-way gene flow, are explored. Reinforcement is found to occur much more easily in a two-island assortative mating model than in any of the other three models. This is due primarily to the fact that in this model the assortative mating allele will automatically become genetically associated in each population with the trait allele that is favored by natural selection on that island. In contrast, natural selection on the trait both favors and opposes the evolution of premating isolation in the two-island preference model, depending on the particular population. These results imply that species recognition in the context of mating may evolve particularly easily when it targets cues that are favored by natural selection in each population. In the continent-island models, reinforcement is found to occur more often under the preference model than the assortative mating model, thus reversing the trend from the two-island models. Patterns of population subdivision may therefore play a role in determining what types of premating isolation may evolve.


Received January 21, 1999. Accepted July 16, 1999.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00003.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
EVO
Special Issue
American Journal of Physical Anthropology

American Journal of Physical Anthropology

Special Issue: Race Reconciled: How Biological Anthropologists View Human Variation.

Read Now

Also of Interest
Evolution & Development

Evolution & Development

Evolution & Development serves as a voice for the rapidly growing research community at the interface of evolutionary and developmental biology.

View a Free Sample Copy

Sign up for Content Alerts