ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology

Volume 16 Issue 2, Pages 124 - 131

Published Online: 21 Dec 2001

Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Asia Pty Ltd and Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 79K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

New hepatitis viruses: Contenders and pretenders
Scott Bowden
Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, North Melbourne, Victoria, Australia  
 Correspondence: Dr S Bowden,
Copyright Blackwell Science Asia Pty. Ltd.
KEYWORDS
cryptogenic hepatitis • GB virus C • hepatitis • hepatitis G virus • non-A-E hepatitis • SEN virus • TT virus

ABSTRACT

Abstract Following the development of tests for hepatitis C virus and hepatitis E virus infection, it became clear that there remained cases of hepatitis that were non-A-E. Such cases provided impetus for the search for additional hepatitis viruses and, by using molecular techniques, several candidates were identified. An enteric agent responsible for sporadic non-A and non-E hepatitis was tentatively called hepatitis F virus. However, the lack of any corroborating reports has cast doubt on its status as a true hepatitis virus. Two groups independently reported the isolation of a blood-borne virus, designated as hepatitis G virus (HGV) and GB virus C (GBV-C) by their respective discoverers. They were later shown to be isolates of the same virus. While the virus has a high prevalence in cases of non-A-E hepatitis, it also has a high prevalence in the appropriate control groups and convincing evidence for its replication in the liver is lacking. Another possible hepatitis virus, TT virus, was discovered in the blood of a patient with post-transfusion non-A-E hepatitis. By using PCR primers designed to overcome the high nucleotide sequence divergence, TT virus was found to be ubiquitous with a worldwide distribution. A disease association is thus unlikely. Most recently, a DNA virus designated as SEN-V has been announced as a major cause of non-A-E hepatitis. Based on limited data available to researchers, SEN-V is the most convincing contender for the new hepatitis virus title. However, the lessons learnt from the hepatitis virus pretenders will need to be applied to SEN-V and any future contenders.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1440-1746.2001.02405.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now