ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Epilepsia

Epilepsia

Volume 40 Issue 8, Pages 1122 - 1128

Published Online: 2 Aug 2005

© 2010 International League Against Epilepsy



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 603K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Coadministration of Phenytoin and Felbamate: Evidence of Additional Phenytoin Dose-Reduction Requirements Based on Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability with Increasing Doses of Felbamate
R. Sachdeo 1 , M. L. Wagner*, S. Sachdeo 1 , R. C. Shumaker , W. H. Lyness , A. Rosenberg , D. Ward, J. L. Perhach
  1 Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Department of Neurology, New Brunswick, New Jersey, U.S.A.   *Rutgers University College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmaceutical Practice, New Brunswick, New Jersey, U.S.A.   ALpharma, USPD, Baltimore, Maryland, U.S.A.   Wallace Laboratories, Clinical Research, Cranbury, and Synthelabo, Regulatory Affairs, Secaucus, New Jersey, U.S.A.
 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. R. Sachdeo at Department of Neurology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08903, U.S.A.
Copyright 1999 International League Against Epilepsy
KEYWORDS
Felbamate • Phenytoin • Coadministration • Dose adjustments

ABSTRACT

Summary: Purpose: This open-label study investigated the pharmacokinetic interaction of phenytoin (PHT) and felbamate (FBM).

Methods: Ten subjects with epilepsy receiving PHT monotherapy were administered increasing doses of FBM (1,200, 1,800, 2,400–3,600 mg/day) at 2-week intervals. PHT doses were reduced by 20% on an individual basis when evidence of clinically significant intolerance was present. With intolerance, the PHT dose was reduced before the next incremental FBM dose. Blood samples were analyzed for FBM, PHT, and PHT metabolite 5-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-5-phenylhydantoin (HPPH).

Results: Total PHT plasma concentrations increased with coadministered FBM. PHT Cmax increased from 15.9 μg/ml at baseline to 20.9 μg/ml after 1,200 mg/day FBM and to 26.8 μg/ml after 1,800 mg/day FBM. Four subjects required a 20% PHT dose reduction after 1,800 mg/day FBM and six after the administration of 2,400 mg/day FBM. All subjects required further 20% PHT reductions before 3,600 mg/day FBM. FBM Cmax and AUCτ were reduced, and apparent clearance increased compared with data from FBM monotherapy.

Conclusions: With the initiation of FBM therapy in subjects receiving PHT, the PHT dosage should be reduced by 20%. Further PHT dose reductions are likely to be necessary if the FBM dose is increased. The requirements for reductions in dose might be predicted by clinical signs of PHT intolerance.


Accepted January 11, 1999.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1528-1157.1999.tb00829.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member

Latest News & Information
EPI Impact Factor

Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign-up for Content Alerts
Latest News & Information

Sign up for the Neurology NewsWire.

Neuro Newsletter

Get 6 free issues of breaking news and research delivered to your inbox each year!

Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter