If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||||||||||||||||||
![]() Journal of Child Psychology and PsychiatryVolume 40 Issue 5, Pages 733 - 742 Published Online: 13 Oct 2003 Journal Compilation © 2010 ACAMH Published on behalf of the Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health
Abstract | Full Text: PDF (Size: 317K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Children with Autism Show Local Precedence in a Divided Attention Task and Global Precedence in a Selective Attention Task Copyright 1999 Association for Child Psychology and Psychiatry KEYWORDS Attention • autistic disorder • perception ABSTRACTChildren with a diagnosis of autism and typically developing children were given two variations of the Navon task (Navon, 1977), which required responding to a target that could appear at the global level, the local level, or both levels. In one variation, the divided attention task, no information was given to children regarding the level at which a target would appear on any one trial. In the other, the selective attention task, children were instructed to attend to either the local or the global level. Typically developing children made most errors when the target appeared at the local level whereas children with autism made more errors when the target appeared at the global level in the divided attention task. Both groups of children were quicker to respond to the global target than the local target in the selective attention task. The presence of normal global processing in the children with autism in one task but not in the other is discussed in terms of a deficit in mechanisms that inhibit local information in the absence of overt priming or voluntary selective attention to local information. Accepted: 13 November 1998; |
|
| |||||||||||||||||
![]() | 50th Anniversary Special Issue |
![]() | The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry |
