ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 985K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Are People Polite to Computers? Responses to Computer-Based Interviewing Systems1
Clifford Nass 2 1 Youngme Moon 2 Paul Carney 3
  1 Department of Communication Stanford University   2 Marketing Unit Harvard University   3 Department of Communication Stanford University
  2 Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Clifford Nass, Department of Communication, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-2050. e-mail: nass@leland.stanford.edu.
 

1 This research was supported by the Social Responses to Communication Technology (SRCT) project at the Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford University. The authors gratefully acknowledge the numerous comments and suggestions provided by the SRCT lab group.

Copyright 1999 V. H. Winston & Sons, Inc.

ABSTRACT

The present studies were designed to test whether people are "polite" to computers. Among people, an interviewer who directly asks about him- or herself will receive more positive and less varied responses than if the same question is posed by a third party. Two studies were designed to determine if the same phenomenon occurs in human–computer interaction. In the first study (N= 30), participants performed a task with a text-based computer and were then interviewed about the performance of that computer on 1 of 3 loci: (a) the same computer, (b) a paper-and-pencil questionnaire, or (c) a different (but identical) text-based computer. Consistent with the politeness prediction, same-computer participants evaluated the computer more positively and more homogeneously than did either paper-and-pencil or different-computer participants. Study 2 (N= 30) replicated the results with voice-based computers. Implications for computer-based interviewing are discussed.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1559-1816.1999.tb00142.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


IT'S TIME TO RENEW

JASP

It’s time to renew your subscription to Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

Click here for 2010 subscription rates and to renew securely online.

Psychology