ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 372K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Excision of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions
Juan C. Paramo, MD, Mark Landeros, MD, Michael D. McPhee, MD, and Thomas W. Mesko, MD, FACS
  Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center of Greater Miami,
Miami Beach, Florida
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Juan C. Paramo, MD, Department of Surgery, Mount Sinai Medical Center of Greater Miami, 4300 Alton Rd., Suite 212A, Miami Beach, FL 33140, U.S.A.
Copyright 1999 The Breast Journal
KEYWORDS
breast • breast surgery • intraoperative • mammography • ultrasonography

ABSTRACT

Abstract: In order to determine if intraoperative ultrasound (US)-guided excision is a feasible procedure, we prospectively studied 15 female patients between July 1996 and December 1998 for US-detected nonpalpable breast lesions. Intraoperative US was used by the operating surgeon to identify the lesion, guide its excision, and evaluate the specimen to document complete removal. A control group of 15 female patients with mammographically detected nonpalpable lesions was used for comparison. These patients underwent preoperative needle localization, excision of the lesions, and specimen radiographs. Age, size of the lesion, total excised tissue volume, and operative time were documented in all cases. Fifteen patients aged 20–83 years (mean 51) underwent US-guided excision, which adequately localized all lesions, and excision was successful in all patients. Specimen US documented the lesion in all cases. Lesion size ranged from 0.7 to 2 cm (mean 1.1) and the total excised tissue volume averaged 30 cc. Mean operative time was 53 minutes (range 30–75 minutes). The 15 patients of the control group ranged in age from 32 to 82 years (mean 61). Excision was successful in all cases. Lesion size ranged from 1 to 2.5 cm (average 1.5) and the average excised tissue volume was 35 cc. Mean operative time was 50 minutes (range 30–75 minutes). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups with regard to age (p = 0.2), operative time (p = 0.5), and total excised tissue volume (p = 0.5). The size of the lesions did have a statistically significant difference (p = 0.01). There were no perioperative complications. In conclusion, US-guided excision of nonpalpable breast lesions is a feasible and effective technique. US documents results immediately, is of minimal discomfort to the patient, avoids the need for preoperative localization, allows the entire procedure to be performed in the operating room, does not require radiation, and provides the surgeon with a useful alternative in selected cases.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1524-4741.1999.99029.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Latest News & Information
TBJ Impact Factor

Latest News & Information
TBJ Survey

Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now