If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||
![]() Personal RelationshipsVolume 6 Issue 4, Pages 449 - 469 Published Online: 20 May 2005 Copyright © 2009 IARR Published on behalf of the International Association for Relationship Research
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 1531K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking The correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the distinguishable case This research was supported by a grant from the National Science Foundation (R. Gonzalez), and by grants from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada as well as the Leverhulme Trust Research Fellowship (D. Griffin). We thank Tony Greenwald, David Kenny, Bill Ickes, Jeff Simpson, and the structural equation modeling seminar at the University of Washington for their helpful suggestions on previous drafts. Copyright 1999 ISSPR ABSTRACT
Many theories of interpersonal relationships distinguish between individual-level processes and dyadic or group-level processes. This suggests that two-person relationships should be studied at the level of the dyad as well as at the level of the individual. We discuss correlational methods for dyads when each dyad contains two different types of individuals (e.g., a husband and wife, a mother and child, or an expert and a novice). In such dyadic interaction designs, the dyad members are said to be distinguishable. We present a method for computing the overall correlation for distinguishable dyads, and we discuss a model for separating the dyad-level and individual-level components of such a correlation. The computational techniques and their interpretation are described using data from 98 heterosexual couples. |