ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 320K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

AMLODIPINE, A LONG-ACTING CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER, ATTENUATES MORNING BLOOD PRESSURE RISE IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS
Toshihiko Ishimitsu , Junichi Minami , Yuhei Kawano , Atsushi Numabe & Shuichi Takishita
  1 Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo University School of Medicine, Tochigi and,   2 Division of Hypertension, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka Japan
Correspondence to: T Ishimitsu
Copyright 1999 Blackwell Science Asia Pty. Ltd.
KEYWORDS
ambulatory blood pressure monitoring • amlodipine • calcium channel blockers • hypertension • morning blood pressure rise • nitrendipine • reflex tachycardia

ABSTRACT

1. The effects of once-daily calcium channel blockers with different plasma half-lives on diurnal blood pressure changes were examined in hypertensive patients.

2. Patients with essential hypertension, nine men and 13 women aged 61±2 years, were treated with amlodipine or nitrendipine in a random cross-over design for 12–16 weeks each. The study drugs were given once daily as monotherapy (n = 8) or in combination with other classes of antihypertensive drugs (n = 14). The plasma half-life of amlodipine is as long as 36 h, while that of nitrendipine is 10 h. At the end of each treatment period, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure and pulse rate were monitored.

3. Average office blood pressure was comparably controlled below 140/90 mmHg by either amlodipine or nitrendipine, both in the monotherapy and the combination therapy groups; however, pulse rate was greater in nitrendipine than in amlodipine either in the monotherapy (by 6 b.p.m., P < 0.05) or in the combination therapy (by 5 b.p.m., P < 0.01).

4. In 24 h blood pressure monitoring, morning (05.30–09.00 h) blood pressure was higher in nitrendipine than in amlodipine by 6/4 mmHg in the monotherapy (P < 0.05) and by 7/5 mmHg in the combination therapy (P < 0.03), although the blood pressure in the remainder of the 24 h did not differ between the two treatment periods. In addition, pulse rate in the daytime (09.30–18.00 h) was greater in nitrendipine than in amlodipine by 6 b.p.m. in the monotherapy (P < 0.01) and by 7 b.p.m. in the combination therapy (P < 0.02).

5. These results suggest slow pharmacokinetics of amlodipine provides an advantage in controlling morning blood pressure and mitigating reflex activation of the sympathetic nervous system.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03072.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Asia Scientists Click Here