ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Allergy

Allergy

Volume 53 Issue 9, Pages 857 - 862

Published Online: 29 Apr 2007

Journal compilation © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 9371K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Azelastine eye-drops in seasonal allergic conjunctivitis or rhinoconjunctivitis.
A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study
C. Giede-Tuch 1 , M. Westhoff 2 , A. Zarth 3
  1 Lindenstr. 5, Hanau, Germany   2 Rathausplatz 2, Munchen-Garching, Germany   3 Am Gangsteig 5, Kirchheim-Heimstetten, Germany
Correspondence to  C. Giede-Tuch, MD Lindenstr. 5 D-63450 Hanau Germany
Copyright Munksgaard 1998
KEYWORDS
allergic conjunctivitis • azelastine • therapeutic use • histamine H1-receptor blockers • human

ABSTRACT

This study was carried out to assess the efficacy of 0.025% and 0.05% azelastine eye-drops in patients with seasonal allergic conjunctivitis of >1 year's duration. A total of 151 patients received 0.025% or 0.05% azelastine eye-drops or placebo b.i.d. for 14 days according to a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-dosing design; 129 patients completed the study as planned. The three target symptoms, scored on 4-point scales, were itching, lacrimation, and redness of the eyes; responders were patients whose symptom sum score decreased by >3 from a baseline score of >6 by day 3. Mean scores of these and five other symptoms were recorded also on days 7 and 14, and patients kept daily diaries of the three main symptoms and swollen eyelids. Responder rates were 73% for 0.025% (p = 0.115 V.V placebo) and 82% for 0.05% azelastine eye-drops (P=0.011 vs placebo) and 56% for placebo. The time courses of the mean (investigators' and patients') scores for the three main symptoms reflected the dose-dependent effect of azelastine eye-drops. One patient each from the two azelastine groups and three from the placebo group withdrew because of ineffieacy. Adverse drug reactions were reported by 14 and 24 patients receiving 0.025% and 0.05% azelastine eye-drops, respectively, and by eight placebo patients. These reactions were mainly slight application site reactions and taste perversion (bitter or unpleasant taste). Azelastine eye-drops are effective and well tolerated at a dose of 0.05% for the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis.


Accepted for publication 6 April 1998

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1398-9995.1998.tb03991.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now

Sign Up Now

Be the first to know about new research in your field

Sign up for FREE e-alerts from Wiley-Blackwell journals!

Sign Up Now