ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

British Journal of Dermatology

British Journal of Dermatology

Volume 137 Issue 6, Pages 934 - 938

Published Online: 28 Jun 2008

Journal compilation © 2010 British Association of Dermatologists



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 1293K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Alpha hydroxyacids modulate stratum corneum barrier function
E. BERARDESCA 1 , F. DISTANTE 1 , G.P. VIGNOLI 1 , C. ORESAJO* B. GREEN*
  1 Department of Dermatology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico S.Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy   *Neostrata Company, Princeton, NJ. U.S.A.
 Correspondence: Enzo Berardesca, MD. E-mail: berarde@ipv36.unipv.it
Copyright 1997 British Association of Dermatologists

ABSTRACT

AbstractReferences

Alpha hydroxyacids (AHAs) are used to enhance stratum corneum desquamation and improve skin appearance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether some AHAs improve skin barrier function and prevent skin irritation. Eleven healthy subjects (aged 28 ± 6 years. mean ± SD) entered the study. Six test sites of 8×5 cm (four different AHAs, vehicle only (VE) and untreated control (UNT)) were selected and randomly rotated on the volar arm and forearm. The four different AHAs at 8% concentration in base cream were glycolic acid (GA), lactic acid, tartaric acid (TA) and gluconolactone (GLU). The products were applied twice a day for 4 weeks (2 mg/cm2). At week 4, a 5% sodium lauryl sulphate (SLS) challenge patch test was performed under occlusion for 6 h (HillTop chamber. 18 mm wide) on each site. Barrier function and skin irritation were evaluated by means of evaporimetry (Servomed EP-1) and chromametry (a* value, Minolta CR200) weekly, and at 0.24 and 48 h after SLS patch removal. No significant differences in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and erythema were observed between the four AHAs at week 4. After SLS challenge. GLU and TA-treated sites resulted in significantly lower TEWL compared with VE, UNT (P<0.01) and GA (P<0.05) both at 24 and 48 h. Similarly, a* values were significantly reduced after irritation in GLU-and TA-treated sites. This study shows that AHAs can modulate stratum corneum barrier function and prevent skin irritation: the effect is not equal for all AHAs. being more marked for the molecules characterized by antioxidant properties.


Accepted for publication 10 July 1997

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2133.1997.tb01554.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter