ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata

Volume 84 Issue 2, Pages 157 - 163

Published Online: 20 Oct 2003

Journal compilation © 2010 The Netherlands Entomological Society



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 65K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Toxicity of acephate to larvae of gypsy moth as a function of host plant and bioassay method
Alison F. Moldenke 1 , Ralph E. Berry 1 , Jeffrey C. Miller 1 James G. Wernz 1 1
  1 Department of Entomology, Cordley 2046, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-2907, USA
 

Department of Crop and Soil Science, ALS 3017, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-7306, USA

Copyright © 2003 The Netherlands Entomological Society
KEYWORDS
gypsy moth • Lymantria dispar • acephate • bioassay • insect cytochrome P-450 • detoxication • herbivore • host plant

ABSTRACT

Abstract

We examined toxicity of acephate to third-instar gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar (L.) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae), under different conditions of administration method, availability of food to larvae during bioassay, host plant, and activity of detoxifying enzymes. Larvae that had been fed field-collected foliage of white alder (Alnus rhombifolia Nutt.) were less susceptible 48 h after treatment with topically applied acephate if they were allowed to continue feeding on foliage during the bioassay period ( LD50= 60.6 μg/g larva ) than if they were not ( LD50= 13.5 μg/g larva ). All surviving larvae were replaced on their original food plant after the 48-h bioassay; of these, 14.4% of the larvae not fed during treatment died before pupation, compared with 1.3% of the larvae fed alder during treatment. The  LD50  obtained for topically treated larvae reared and treated on Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, (51.1 μg/g larva) was comparable to that obtained for larvae fed alder (60.0 μg/g larva) throughout treatment. Larvae treated orally with acephate, however, were slightly more susceptible when reared on Douglas-fir ( LC50, 20.3 ppm ) than when reared on alder ( LC50, 27.0 ppm ). Post-treatment mortality in orally treated larvae was 10.3% in those fed alder and 9.5% in those fed Douglas-fir. Higher cytochrome P-450 activities in larvae reared on Douglas-fir apparently did not enhance tolerance to acephate. Both sexes of orally treated larvae took significantly longer to pupate than did controls on both foliage types, as did topically treated males fed Douglas-fir. Pupal weight generally was slightly, but not always significantly, higher in treated than untreated larvae under all dietary and treatment regimes.


Accepted: May 15, 1997

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00210.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here