ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

Journal of Fish Biology

Journal of Fish Biology

Volume 51 Issue 2, Pages 389 - 401

Published Online: 4 Apr 2005

Journal compilation © 2010 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 173K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

The cryptic responses of hatchery-reared sole to a natural sand substratum
T. Ellis*†, B. R. Hoowell R. N. Hughes*
  *Ecology Group, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, U.K.   CEFAS, Conwy Laboratory, Benarth Road, Conwy, North Wales, LL32 8UB, U.K.
  Author to whom correspondence should be addressed at: CEFAS, Conwy Laboratory, Benarth Road, Conwy, North Wales, LL32 8UB, U.K. Tel.: + 44 (0)1492 593883; fax: +44 (0)1492 592123; email: t.ellis@cefas.co.uk
Copyright 1997 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles
KEYWORDS
Solea solea • burying • colour adaptation • crypsis • stock enhancement

ABSTRACT

In laboratory experiments, both reared and wild sole Solea solea selected a sand substratum in preference to a hard substratum. Reared sole with no previous experience of sand buried quickly when placed on sand. Light motivated burial, and the motivation of reared sole to bury was as strong as that of wild sole. The burial efficiency (the proportion of the ocular side covered by sand after a single burial attempt) of reared sole was lower than that of wild sole, but increased to that of wild sole after a period of 12 days maintenance on sand. Motivation to bury is therefore innate, but efficiency is affected by experience. The reactive distance of reared sole to a standardized predation threat was the same as that of wild sole and was shorter when buried (6 cm) than when not buried (15 cm). Burial therefore affected the response to a predation threat, indicating that burial is a cryptic behaviour. Munsell colour charts were used to determine the time required for reared sole to match the skin colour 'tone' of wild sole after placement on sand. Adaptation of colour value (lightness) took 4–7 days, but adaptation of chroma (intensity of colour) and hue took 33 and 69 days respectively. It is therefore recommended that flatfishes reared for stock enhancement exercises are conditioned to sand prior to release due to the relatively long time required for crypsis to improve through colour adaptation and burying.


(Received 23 September 1996, Accepted 23 March 1997)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01674.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Click here to go to the conference website
Sign up here