If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||
![]() Alimentary Pharmacology & TherapeuticsVolume 11 Issue 2, Pages 365 - 372 Published Online: 2 Oct 2003 Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
Abstract | Full Text: PDF (Size: 229K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Lansoprazole 15 and 30 mg daily in maintaining healing and symptom relief in patients with reflux oesophagitis This study was supported financially by Lederle Läkemedel, Cyanamid Nordiska AB, Stockholm, Sweden. ABSTRACTBackground: In patients with reflux oesophagitis, endoscopic healing and symptom relief are considered important treatment goals in long-term care. Aim: To compare the effect of lansoprazole 15 and 30 mg daily on maintaining endoscopic healing and symptom relief in patients with moderate reflux oesophagitis. Patients and methods: In a single-centre, double-blind randomized clinical trial, 103 patients with grade 1 or 2 reflux oesophagitis who were endoscopically healed and asymptomatic after lansoprazole 30 mg daily for 12 weeks, were randomized to maintenance therapy with either lansoprazole 15 mg or 30 mg o.m. Endoscopy was repeated after 3, 6 and 12 months, and symptom relief assessed after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Relapse of oesophagitis or symptoms were considered end-points. Results: After 12 months, 14/50 patients (28%) receiving lansoprazole 15 mg daily had suffered an endoscopic relapse compared to 8/53 patients (15%) treated with lansoprazole 30 mg daily. A life table analysis showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.086). Significantly more patients were kept in complete symptomatic remission in the 30 mg group (P<0.01). In the 15 mg group, 23/50 (46%) had suffered either an endoscopic or symptomatic relapse on completion of the study, compared to 12/53 (23%) in the 30 mg group. A life table analysis showed this difference to be statistically significant (P=0.010). Lansoprazole 15 and 30 mg daily were equally well tolerated. Conclusion: No statistically significant differences were found in endoscopic relapse rate or occurrence of adverse events, while lansoprazole 30 mg proved superior to 15 mg in maintaining patients in symptomatic relief and combined endoscopic and symptomatic remission.
|