ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 269K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Feline acne and results of treatment with mupirocin in an open clinical trial: 25 cases (1994–96)
Stephen D. White , Patrick B. Bordeau , Philippe Blumstein , Catherine Ibisch , Eric GuaguÈre , Philippe Denerolle , Didier N. Carlotti & Katherine V. Scott
  1 Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA,   2 Unité de Dermatologie, Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Nantes, route de Gachet, CP 3013, 44087 Nantes Cedex 03, France,   3 Clinique Vétérinaire Saint Bernard, 598 Avenue de Dunkerque, 59160 Lomme, France,   4 Clinique Vétérinaire, 14 Blvd. Stalingrad, 83500 La Seyne-sur-Mer, France,   5 Clinique Vétérinaire, 100 Avenue de l'Aquitaine, 33560 Sainte Eulalie, France,   6 Department of Veterinary Teaching Hospital, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA
Correspondence to: Dr. S. D. White.
Copyright 1997 Blackwell Science Ltd
KEYWORDS
cats • feline acne • mupirocin

ABSTRACT

Clinical and diagnostic parameters, and response to topical mupirocin in 25 cats with feline acne are described. The chin was the most common area affected, but the lower lip, upper lip and the commissure of the lips also frequently had lesions. The most common clinical sign was the presence of crusts, followed by comedones, erythema, alopecia, pruritus and nodules/fistulas. Deep skin scrapings for ectoparasites, cytological examination of superficial skin scrapings, and fungal cultures from the chin were performed on all cats. Dermatophytes were cultured from two cats and Malassezia pachydermatis was cultured (n = 2), seen on cytology smears (n = 1), or noted on histopathology (n = 1). Skin biopsies were obtained from three of the cats and most commonly showed dilatation of sebaceous gland ducts, neutrophilic or pyogranulomatous infiltration of the sebaceous glands, and pyogranulomatous inflammation of the dermis.

All cats were treated with topical 2% mupirocin ointment twice daily for 3 weeks as the sole treatment. Treatment response was excellent in 15 cats and good in nine cats. One cat had a contact reaction to the mupirocin, necessitating stopping treatment. The response to treatment of the six cats with dermatophyte or years involvement was good (n = 3) or excellent (n = 3).


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1365-3164.1997.d01-16.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now

Sign up for E-Alerts

Vet Updates on Twitter

Free Trial

Sign Up Now
 Equine Veterinary Journal

Equine Veterinary Journal is recruiting a new editor.

Click to find out more or to apply

Sign Up Now
Veterinary Dermatology

Renew your Subscription for 2010!

Veterinary Dermatology

Sign up now