ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 998K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Staff Evaluation of a High-Risk Pregnancy Program
Marlene C. Mackey R.N., FAAN 1 , 3 Martha Sobral B.S.N., M.A., R.N. 2
  1 Marlene C. Mackey is with the University of South Carolina, College of Nursing, Columbia.   2 Martha Sobral is with Richland Memorial Hospital, Columbia, South Carolina.
  3 Address correspondence to Marlene C. Mackey, Ph.D., R.N., FAAN, University of South Carolina, College of Nursing, Columbia, SC 29208.
Copyright 1997 Blackwell Science, Inc.

ABSTRACT

AbstractA southeastern state implemented a multidisciplinary health care program for Medicaid eligible, medically high-risk pregnant women and their infants as part of a statewide effort to reduce perinatal morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to obtain the staff's evaluation of this high-risk-pregnancy program. Clinical, supervisory, and clerical staff (N= 182) completed a questionnaire about the operation of the program and its perceived benefits. Staff identified program strengths: nurse case management, interdisciplinary structure, quality care, and positive health outcomes. Staff also identified program limitations including limited staff and time, inflexible protocols, administrative tasks, and narrow enrollment criteria. The majority of staff reported that the following barriers interfered with the effective operation of the program: paperwork, limited support, time, difficulty locating patients, and mandated time frames for patient contact. The majority of staff also reported that transportation most interfered with patient access to the program. The findings of this study support the need for ongoing staff evaluation of all perinatal health care programs.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1525-1446.1997.tb00278.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Sign Up Now

Nurse Author & Editor

Nursing & Health Sciences