ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

The Plant Journal

The Plant Journal

Volume 9 Issue 4, Pages 431 - 439

Published Online: 5 Mar 2002

Journal compilation © 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the Society for Experimental Biology



Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 1209K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Induction of systemic acquired resistance in cucumber by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae 61 HrpZPss protein
N.E. Strobel 1 , C. Ji 1 , S. Gopalan 2 , J.A. Kuc 1 and S.Y. He 1,2, *
  1 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40546, USA   2 MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1312, USA
*For correspondence (fax +1 517 353 9168; e-mail hes@pilot.msu.edu).
Copyright Blackwell Science Ltd\Society for Experimental Biology

ABSTRACT

Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is an inducible plant defense response and is effective against a broad spectrum of pathogens. Biological induction of SAR usually follows plant cell death resulting from the plant hypersensitive response (HR) elicited by an avirulent pathogen or from disease necrosis caused by a virulent pathogen. The elicitation of the HR and disease necroses by pathogenic bacteria is controlled by hrp genes. Previously, it was shown that the Pseudomonas syringae 61 (Pss61) HrpZPss protein (formally harpinPss) elicited the HR in plants. In this study, it is shown that HrpZPss induced SAR in cucumber to diverse pathogens, including the anthracnose fungus (Colletotrichum lagenarium), tobacco necrosis virus and the bacterial angular leaf spot bacterium (P. s. pv. lachrymans). A hrpH mutant of Pss61, which is defective in the secretion of HrpZPss and, possibly, other protein elicitors, failed to elicit SAR. Pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, including peroxidase, β-glucanase and chitinases, were induced in cucumber plants inoculated with Pss61, C. lagenarium or HrpZPss. The induction patterns of PR proteins by HrpZPss and Pss61 were the same, but were different from that induced by C. lagenarium. Interestingly, the hrpH mutant induced two of the three identified PR proteins, despite its failure to induce SAR. These results suggest that proteinaceous elicitors, such as HrpZPss, that traverse the bacterial Hrp secretion pathway are involved in the biological induction of SAR and that at least some PR proteins can be induced by bacterial factors that are not controlled by hrp genes.


Received 19 September 1995; revised 2 January 1996; accepted 9 January 1996.

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.09040431.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign up here
Special Issue
Click here to read the Special Issue
Asia Scientists Click Here