If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | |||
![]() Geophysical Journal InternationalVolume 122 Issue 3, Pages 725 - 734 Published Online: 3 Apr 2007 Journal compilation © 2010 RAS Published on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 872K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Radial models of mantle viscosity: results from a genetic algorithm Copyright 1995 Royal Astronomical Society KEYWORDS genetic algorithm • geoid • mantle viscosity • seismic tomography ABSTRACTThe long-wavelength component of the geoid has been used to constrain radial variations in mantle viscosity using 3-D velocity anomaly models determined from seismic tomography as the buoyancy forces driving viscous flow. Using a Genetic Algorithm (GA), the robustness of mantle viscosity models obtained by calculus-based optimization methods is investigated. GAS are a relatively new class of optimization techniques, which are generating a growing interest in the geophysics community. These methods can be particularly useful for solving highly non-linear optimization problems. Unlike traditional techniques, GAS do not require derivative information to form a Jacobian matrix or sensitivity kernels. Models are constructed from pieces of successful models following a simple set of rules. These simple rules are driven by stochastic, rather than deterministic, means. Because of the efficiency of the GA for the mantle viscosity problem, it is possible to explore a greater range of potential solutions than with a traditional optimization method. It is found that, while both calculus-based and GA optimization methods find viscosity models with a low-viscosity transition zone, the GA finds another class of models, with a high viscosity in the transition zone, that also satisfies the geoid data. The geoid alone is unable to resolve low-viscosity transition-zone models from high-viscosity transition-zone models. The effect of the scaling between seismic velocity and density on the preferred viscosity model is also explored. While a velocity-to-density scaling with a pronounced increase in the transition zone provides the best fit to the geoid, the preferred vertical viscosity profile is insensitive to the velocity-to-density scaling. Accepted 1994 November 19. Received 1993 November 10 |