If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.
It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.
Wiley InterScience | ||||||||||||||||
![]() Growth and ChangeVolume 24 Issue 4, Pages 487 - 508 Published Online: 3 Jul 2006 © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Abstract | References | Full Text: PDF (Size: 1151K) | Related Articles | Citation Tracking Growth Linkages and Urban Development in Niger The views expressed are those of the authors and do not represent the views or policy of the US. Agency for International Development. The authors would like to acknowledge the data collection assistance of their Nigerian counterparts, especially M. Seriba Coulibaly Mousa. Copyright 1993 Center for Business and Economic Research, University of Kentucky ABSTRACTABSTRACT. It is increasingly recognized that the assumption that the supply of tradable output is perfectly elastic, which underlies many regional economic models (esp. economic base models), does not hold in many developing countries. When the supply of tradable output (primarily agricultural products) and, in many cases, non-tradable output is inelastic, the resulting income multipliers will be substantially reduced. Recent calls for the promotion of market towns and smaller urban centers have not fully considered the impact of supply in elasticities on the capacity of such measures to stimulate broad-based development. This study uses data collected from firms in several market-town systems in Niger to examine the probable consequences. The paper argues that such policies are unlikely to be effective in countries like Niger where the vulnerability of the rural economy has severely limited the elasticity of the supply response, especially for agriculture and nonfarm production by small-scale producers. |
| |||||||||||||||