ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

New Phytologist

New Phytologist

Volume 115 Issue 3, Pages 567 - 571

Published Online: 28 Apr 2006

Journal compilation © 2010 New Phytologist Trust



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: PDF (Size: 566K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Numerical taxonomy of the wild bananas (Musa)
N. W. SIMMONDS 1 S. T. C. WEATHERUP 2
  1 Edinburgh School of Agriculture, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG   2 Biometrics Division, Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland and Department of Biometrics, The Queen's University of Belfast, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX
Copyright 1990 The New Phytologist
KEYWORDS
Musa • bananas (wild) • numerical taxonomy

ABSTRACT

AbstractReferences

The wild bananas (Musa) were described in numerical terms many years ago, well before 'numerical taxonomy' became popular. Those descriptions, slightly supplemented, are here subjected to analysis by modern methods. Principal co-ordinate and clustering techniques give essentially similar results. Five groupings, rather than the four sections traditionally recognized, can be discerned. The fifth group contains five taxa previously included in section Musa (informally 'Eumusa') or of uncertain affinity. This group is only somewhat weakly distinguishable from section Australimusa. Several species previously regarded as of uncertain affinity seem to find 'natural' places. The results are by no means revolutionary but do encourage modest alteration of traditional views.


(Received 26 March 1990; accepted 6 April 1990)

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1469-8137.1990.tb00485.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Click here for more information

Click here to read more

Follow us on Twitter