ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

International Journal of Dermatology

International Journal of Dermatology

Volume 47 Issue 1, Pages 29 - 35

Published Online: 17 Dec 2007

Journal compilation © 2010 International Society of Dermatology



< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 1617K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

Report
Eosinophilic fasciitis: demographics, disease pattern and response to treatment: report of 12 cases and review of the literature
Lindsay Bischoff, Senior Medical Student, and Chris T. Derk, Asst Prof
From the Jefferson Medical College, Philadelphia PA, and Division of Rheumatology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA
Correspondence
Chris T. Derk, md, ms Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Rheumatology Thomas Jefferson University 613 Curtis Bldg 1015 Walnut Street Philadelphia PA 19107 USA
E-mail: Chris.Derk@jefferson.edu
Copyright © 2008 The International Society of Dermatology

ABSTRACT

AbstractIntroductionMethodsResultsDiscussionReferences

Background Eosinophilic fasciitis is a rare scleroderma-like illness. The clinical spectrum of the disease has evolved since its initial description.

Methods We identified all patients diagnosed with eosinophilic fasciitis over the past 10 years at our scleroderma clinic. Demographics, disease pattern, serologies, tissue pathology and reponse to treatment were all recorded.

Results Twelve patients with eosinophilic fasciitis were identified in our clinic over the past 10 years. The mean age at diagnosis was 49.8 ± 9.8 years, with nine female and three male patients. The first symptoms were noticed at an average of 8.8 ± 6.1 months before diagnosis. The mean initial absolute peripheral blood eosinophil count was 1188 ± 1059 cells/L. Two patients had a monoclonal gammopathy, and two had positive ANA titers. All patients received corticosteroids, 10 of whom received the equivalent dose of > 20 mg/day of prednisone for more than a month. Five patients received hydroxychloroquine, two received methotrexate, one received cyclosporine, one received topical tacrolimus, and one received sulfasalazine. At a mean follow up of 17.6 months (range 2–94 months), 8 patients had a good response to treatment, 2 patients had no effect, and 2 patients had a poor response to treatment.

Conclusion High dose corticosteroid treatment lasting longer than a month with or without an immunosuppressive agent helped most patients with eosinophilic fasciitis, best results seen in those patients who were initiated treatment early on after their first symptoms.


DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-4632.2007.03544.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Sign Up Now
Wiley Medical Twitter