ADVERTISEMENT

If you are seeing this message, you may be experiencing temporary network problems. Please wait a few minutes and refresh the page. If the problem persists, you may wish to report it to your local Network Manager.

It is also possible that your web browser is not configured or not able to display style sheets. In this case, although the visual presentation will be degraded, the site should continue to be functional. We recommend using the latest version of Microsoft or Mozilla web browser to help minimise these problems.

Wiley InterScience

< Previous Abstract  |  Next Abstract >

Save Article to My Profile      Download Citation      Request Permissions

Abstract |  References  |  Full Text: HTML, PDF (Size: 337K)  | Related Articles | Citation Tracking

PRIORITY CONTRIBUTION
Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning
William J. Sutherland 1*, Mark J. Bailey 2 , Ian P. Bainbridge 3 , Tom Brereton 4 , Jaimie T. A. Dick 5 , Joanna Drewitt 3 , Nicholas K. Dulvy 6 , Nicholas R. Dusic 7 , Robert P. Freckleton 8 , Kevin J. Gaston 8 , Pam M. Gilder 9 , Rhys E. Green 1,10 , A. Louise Heathwaite 11 , Sally M. Johnson 12 , David W. Macdonald 13 , Roger Mitchell 14 , Daniel Osborn 15 , Roger P. Owen 16 , Jules Pretty 17 , Stephanie V. Prior 1 , Havard Prosser 18 , Andrew S. Pullin 19 , Paul Rose 20 , Andrew Stott 21 , Tom Tew 22 , Chris D. Thomas 23 , Des B. A. Thompson 12 , Juliet A. Vickery 24 , Matt Walker 25 , Clive Walmsley 26 , Stuart Warrington 27 , Andrew R. Watkinson 28 , Rich J. Williams 29 , Rosie Woodroffe 30 and Harry J. Woodroof 31
  1 Conservation Science Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK;   2 Natural Environment Research Council, Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, CEH-Oxford, Mansfield Road, Oxford, OX1 3SR, UK;   3 Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate, The Scottish Government, Victoria Quay, Edinburgh, EH6 6QQ,UK;   4 Butterfly Conservation, Manor Yard, East Lulworth, Wareham, Dorset, BH20 5QP, UK;   5 School of Biological Sciences, Medical and Biological Centre, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, BT9 7BL, N. Ireland, UK;   6 Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Sciences, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, Suffolk, NR33 OHT,UK;   7 British Ecological Society, 26 Blades Court, Deodar Road, London, SW15 2NU, UK;   8 Department of Animal & Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN,UK;   9 Environment Agency, Rio House, Aztec West, Bristol, BS32 4UD, UK;   10 Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, The Lodge, Sandy, SG19 2 DL,UK;   11 Centre for Sustainable Water Management, The Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ,UK;   12 Scottish Natural Heritage, Silvan House, 3rd Floor East, 231 Costorphine Road, Edinburgh EH12 7AT, UK;   13 Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, University of Oxford, Department of Zoology, Tubney House, Abingdon Road, Tubney, Abingdon, OX13 5QL,UK;   14 Arcadia, 192 Sloane Street, London, SW1X 9QX, UK;   15 Science to Policy and Public Sector Liaison, Natural Environment Research Council, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon, SN2 1EU, UK;   16 Scottish Environment Protection Agency, Greyhope House, Greyhope Road, Torry, Aberdeen, AB11 9RD,UK;   17 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Essex, Colchester, CO4 3SQ, UK;   18 Welsh Assembly Government, Cathays Park, Cardiff, CF10 3NQ, UK;   19 Centre for Evidence-Based Conservation, School of Environment and Natural Resources, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK;   20 JNCC, Monkstone House, City Road, Peterborough, PE1 1JY, UK;   21 Natural Environment Science Division, Defra, 1/05 Temple Quay House, Bristol, BS1 6EB,UK;   22 Natural England, Northminster House, Peterborough, PE1 1UA, UK;   23 Department of Biology (Area 18), University of York, PO Box 373, York, YO10 5YW, UK;   24 British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2 PU, UK;   25 New Scientist, Lacon House, 84 Theobald's Road, London, WC1X 8NS, UK;   26 Countryside Council for Wales, Maes y Ffynnon, Penrhosgarnedd, Bangor, LL57 2DW, UK;   27 The National Trust, East of England Regional Office, Westley Bottom, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk IP33 3WD, UK;   28 Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research and School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK;   29 Microsoft Research Ltd, 7 J. J. Thomson Ave, Cambridge, CB3 0FB, UK;   30 Institute of Zoology, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY;   31 Horizon Scanning Centre, Government Office for Science, Bay 535, Kingsgate House, 66–74 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 6SW, UK
  *Correspondence author. E-mail: w.sutherland@zoo.cam.ac.uk
Copyright Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society
KEYWORDS
conservation • conservation policy • decision making • environmental risk • nanotechnology

ABSTRACT

  • 1. 

    Horizon scanning is an essential tool for environmental scientists if they are to contribute to the evidence base for Government, its agencies and other decision makers to devise and implement environmental policies. The implication of not foreseeing issues that are foreseeable is illustrated by the contentious responses to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops in the UK, and by challenges surrounding biofuels, foot and mouth disease, avian influenza and climate change.

  • 2. 

    A total of 35 representatives from organizations involved in environmental policy, academia, scientific journalism and horizon scanning were asked to use wide consultation to identify the future novel or step changes in threats to, and opportunities for, biodiversity that might arise in the UK up to 2050, but that had not been important in the recent past. At least 452 people were consulted.

  • 3. 

    Cases for 195 submitted issues were distributed to all participants for comments and additions. All issues were scored (probability, hazard, novelty and overall score) prior to a 2-day workshop. Shortlisting to 41 issues and then the final 25 issues, together with refinement of these issues, took place at the workshop during another two rounds of discussion and scoring.

  • 4. 

    We provide summaries of the 25 shortlisted issues and outline the research needs.

  • 5. 

    We suggest that horizon scanning incorporating wide consultation with providers and users of environmental science is used by environmental policy makers and researchers. This can be used to identify gaps in knowledge and policy, and to identify future key issues for biodiversity, including those arising from outside the domains of ecology and biodiversity.

  • 6. 

    Synthesis and applications. Horizon scanning can be used by environmental policy makers and researchers to identify gaps in knowledge and policy. Drawing on the experience, expertise and research of policy advisors, academics and journalists, this exercise helps set the agenda for policy, practice and research.


Received 13 October 2007; accepted 21 February 2008
Handling Editor: Paul Thompson

DIGITAL OBJECT IDENTIFIER (DOI)
10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x About DOI

Related Articles

  • Find other articles like this in Wiley InterScience
  • Find articles in Wiley InterScience written by any of the authors

Wiley InterScience is a member of CrossRef.

Cross Ref Member


Editor's Choice
Applied Ecology in Asia

Read our Virtual Issue on Applied Ecology in Asia free online

Virtual Issue

This Virtual Issue accompanies our latest Special Profile: Challenges and Prospects for Applied Ecology in China, now available online

Click to read the Virtual Issue
Free online throughout 2010
Sign up here
Become a member of the

BES member benefits

Meeting registration discounts, member newsletter, grants, low-cost journal access and much more… all for just £40 (£20 for students and retired members).

Click Here